Comparable evidence across delivery modes.
Use a consistent evidence mechanism across campus and online programmes while preserving local course design and faculty ownership.
Integrevise for Boston University
Integrevise turns an existing BU submission and rubric into a short adaptive oral dialogue. Faculty see direct evidence of each student's reasoning, while students receive personalised feedback—without replacing the assessment or relying on AI detection.
Value at every level
Integrevise works with the briefs and rubrics BU faculty already use, keeping academic judgement human while making student reasoning easier to see across campus and online programmes.
Use a consistent evidence mechanism across campus and online programmes while preserving local course design and faculty ownership.
Review concise, rubric-aligned evidence of what students can explain without scheduling and conducting every oral conversation manually.
Give each learner a transparent opportunity to explain decisions, identify gaps and receive feedback designed to support the next step.
Evidence before adoption
A university evaluation of Integrevise's adaptive oral approach has been published in the peer-reviewed journal Trends in Higher Education. It offers early evidence to inform a bounded BU evaluation—not a claim of institution-wide outcomes.
Read the peer-reviewed studyDirectly aligned with BU
BU's current classroom guidance asks instructors to clarify expectations, design for learning processes and treat AI-detection tools as highly fallible. Integrevise adds a direct, faculty-governed way for students to demonstrate the thinking behind submitted work.
A focused next step
In 20 minutes, compare one campus or online brief and rubric with the Integrevise mechanism, then identify the evidence, accessibility, privacy and implementation questions worth testing.
Book a 20-minute conversation No assessment redesign or preparation required.